.
Feedback

Sayville Residents Get First Look At School Budget

2012-13 proposed spending plan unveiled at recent board of education meeting.

Sayville Schools are in "good form" to weather the financial storm, according to Sayville's assistant superintendent for business John Belmonte, who said energy cost savings and a new special education program represent two positive aspects of the proposed budget.

At their Jan. 12 meeting, the the Sayville Board of Education discussed the 2012-2013 proposed budget and Belmonte provided a thorough explanation of the 2-percent Property Tax Cap.

Belmonte delivered a slide show presentation outlining the proposed $85,674,961 budget, which represents a 4.76-percent budget percentage increase and a 4.77-percent proposed increase on tax rate.

The district will save $75,000-$105,000 on natural gas costs by joining an energy consortium. With an energy peformance contract currently underway, the district can expect to see an additional $700,000 per year in energy savings.

Belmonte explained that although New York's Property Tax Levy Cap has been referred to as a "2-pecent tax cap," it doesn't restrict any proposed tax levy increase to 2-percent, but is a "spending limit" on the district's tax levy, not tax rate.

As Belmonte stated on his slides, "a district's tax levy is the additional pot of money needed to fund a portion of the voter approved budget, after accounting for all other revenue sources including state aid. It is only one of several revenue sources."

A district's tax rate is used to assess the taxes needed over the entire community.

"The tax rate is affected by the community's assessed valuation and base allocations (ratio between residential and commercial properties)," Belmonte said. "Based on these variables, the change in the tax rate is usually different from the change in the tax levy."

The district won't receive information on the assessed value and base allocations until the beginning of August, according to Belmonte.

Numerous calls to the State Education Department (SED) and State Comptroller's Office have yielded little, if any, information, noted Belmonte. He said districts have received no guidance from the state regarding the finer details of this law, such as the formula guidelines for determining the tax levy cap.

"State agencies haven't finalized components of this formula [used to calculate the 2-percent spending limit] yet," Belmonte said. "What we present is our best interpretation based on the professionals at the SED we have dealt with, so there may be adjustments to this."

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Sayville-Bayport Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
John Thompson May 19, 2013 at 10:26 pm
And so the taxpayer is once again asked to give more to an already out of control and bloatedRead More system. Every year the school districts on Long Island receive increases of millions of dollars to their budgets, and still they want to bleed the taxpayer for more. As two income families struggle to pay exorbitant tax bills, we’re asked to pay even more? We’ll here’s a novel idea, how about if the teachers union’s began demanding less? This early retirement baloney must stop, salaries should be capped, administrators and their staffs must be cut by at least eighty percent. In addition, educators and staff should have to pay for their own medical and retirement plans just as the rest of us must. Here on Long Island, families are suffering and sacrificing, and many are being forced to leave due to taxes which are out of control. It is time for educators to cease hiding behind children with threats of decreased student programs, and to make an honest and realistic observation as to why things are as bad as they are. To blame parents for not paying enough into the system to support the schools is ludicrous. The real problem lies in a system which is self serving, and run by incompetents blind to the harm they are inflicting upon our children and families.