Community Corner

Letter to Editor: Don't Close the Fire Island Breach at Old Inlet

An organization says fill-in not good for beach, bay or residents.

Dear Editor,

I saw your article on the Fire Island breach and thought you may be interested in the group "Save the Great South Bay," who has experts saying that the breach may actually benefit the surrounding area.

Here is the press release released this week from the group:

Find out what's happening in Sayville-Bayportwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Artificially Closing Breach at the Old Inlet could Prevent The Bay From Cleaning Itself, say Local Experts

Save The Great South Bay, a Long Island advocacy group composed of marine biologists, fishermen, baymen, boaters, restaurant owners, and local citizens, have been campaigning to prevent the closure of a breach at the Old Inlet.

Find out what's happening in Sayville-Bayportwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

The breach, created by Sandy, according to data collected by The Nature Conservancy, Stony Brook University, and independent marine biologists, has shown that the reopening of the Old Inlet is flushing the bay, bringing in clean water, fish, and other marine life.

In the next several days, the commissioner of the New York State Department of Conservation, Joseph Martens, will decide whether or not to close the breach of the Old Inlet.

Senator Charles Schumer is on record, since November 19, that the breach should be closed. While this is but a small line item in the number of projects the Army Corps of Engineers will be taking on in the $4.5 billion allotted to rebuild the shorelines, they seem inclined to fill the breach as well.

Why are we undoing the one thing that Sandy did that is actually helping the environment –the breach at the Old Inlet – despite all the science, while no one is paying attention to situations like Bay Park, where many millions of gallons of semi treated sewage is killing everything, and will be for a long time?

What are our priorities? We can save the Great South Bay and other waters. But we need a sustainability plan. We owe it to future generations to fix the bay.

Stuart F. Gruskin, New York State Chief Conservation and External Affairs Officer The Nature Conservancy, is one of the many experts Save the Great South Bay cites to makes its case.

In a January 18 letter to The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Gruskin writes, “At a standing room only public meeting on December 1, there was overwhelming public opposition to the artificial closure of the breach. The general public, and many different constituencies, recognize that in this case nature has provided us with an important benefit, and there are compelling reasons to take advantage of that.”

The full letter, with detailed information about the breach at the Old Inlet, can be found on the group’s Facebook page. There are many other research documents here as well.

Those wishing to join the Save the Great South Bay group are encouraged to go to this site. The breach and getting the NYS Department of Conservation to make the right decision is issue one, but revitalizing the bay will take a lot of collective effort over a long time.

Save the Great South Bay is a group of concerned citizens who grew up by the bay, live by the bay, clammed, fished and swam in its waters, took a ferry or a clam boat across to Fire Island, sailed or boated on it.

The group was formed to save The Great South Bay of Long Island from further neglect -- seepage from septic tanks, lawn fertilizer, and road run off – while simultaneously reintroducing clams, oysters, fish. and healthy marine habitats. We believe that a clean bay is good for the economy and is our legacy for future generations.

Learn more about its efforts at this site.

Sincerely,

Marshall Brown

Save the Great South Bay


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here